-
Shibboleth
I think people should treat this thought dialectically. Firstly ,I want to affirm the prescience of Guanzi's statement.He mentions the importance of the material culture's development.But what he stands is an era of lack of material civilization, it would inevitably have a limitation. Especially when we take today's life as an example, we will find that ,though today's Chinese material culture is booming, most our people are living in a well-off life;our spiritual culture is still on an unstable situation. The gap in national quality level is still too large. And we are hard to find a truly unified value orientation especially when face all kinds of cultural invasion or cultural infiltration. Maybe in other words, we today's life is still not up to the standard mentioned by Guanzi. The improvement of living standards has indeed brought people a higher spiritual pursuit, but do people pursue the standard of propriety and righteousness in this process? I'm afraid that today our people's highest value of life is different from that of ancient time. Every era has its own moral value standard, the connotation of propriety and righteousness may also become more and more different with the development of material civilization.