• 最喜欢
• 最早
• 最新

• 欧kk

  And whether our actions are evil or not is not the result of discernment, but the natural sentiments of the human heart. Goodness and evil are based on the natural inclination of the human heart, which cannot be discerned or controlled or changed by any discernment. Thus, since determinism leads to an absurd conclusion, determinism itself is also absurd. With respect to free will, Hume argues that free will theorists deny constancy in human nature, and since this is the case, moral responsibility is also unnecessary for them. For the reason why one would punish a person is because it is thought that he can be corrected by punishment, and this judgment is based on the constancy of human nature, and if it is denied, then moral responsibility is also meaningless. In summary, Hume argues against free will and determinism. But in chapter 8 Hume does not mention his own compatibilism. Hugh refutes the theory by concluding that it is self-contradictory, a logical method worth learning. Bu

  2023-06-04 喜欢(0) 回复(0)