read report

As a familiar and life related Chinese culture reader, the Chinese version is exported to foreign friends. 

Although it is impossible to describe the possibility of Hongpian's masterpiece with the master of the subject, 

the text of the condensed structure of the entries is not precise enough. 

For example, the shadow puppet pictures failed to explain what the play was and what the role was, 

so did the gardens. Two prints were mentioned in the Four Great Years, while the Taohuawu did not have the

 corresponding pictures. The crescent shovel was said to be a knife. It could not be simply and intuitively introduced.

 The popularity was ambiguous. What's the use of this book. In terms of structure,

 Emei, which is different from Shaolin and Wudang, has not mentioned it. This is the most obvious of the three Kung Fu, 

which can not be demonstrated in Guiguzi's three different strategies. 

When it comes to dress, according to my understanding, in the 1920s, what kind of dress

 should the local people wear with their ankles on the floor? The collar kept rotating, and the upper 

sleeve was not sleeved or half sleeved. As for the transition to the 1940s, there were various changes in the reverse 

sleeve and the hem of the jacket. As for tight fitting and high split, it should be a port in colonial areas. 

It should not be confused with simple style and juxtaposition words. The overall scholars are not meticulous enough in 

writing, which falls within the scope of three categories of books that they do not read. Unfortunately, this kind of book

 is not easy to distinguish, and it also lists a lot of references.

2022-12-10

分享

喜欢(0)