Frankenstein Review

Mary Shelley’s 1818 classic merges Gothic horror and sci-fi to warn of hubris in creation, resonating powerfully across. Victor Frankenstein, driven by godlike ambition, constructs a creature from corpses but recoils at its appearance, abandoning it. This rejection sparks a tragic cycle: the creature, capable of reason and longing, is shunned for its form, turning its initial innocence into destructive rage. The creature’s eloquent plea for companionship exposes society’s shallow judgment and the cruelty of isolation. Victor’s refusal to fulfill his responsibility—destroying the female companion he begins to create—validates the creature’s belief that rejection justifies vengeance, mirroring humanity’s failure to accept the “other.” The novel critiques unbridled scientific ambition. Victor’s pursuit of glory ignores moral duty, embodying the risk of treating nature as a malleable tool. The creature’s inversion of their roles (“I am your master”) challenges human hubris, highlighting the fragility of control when empathy is absent. Shelley’s narrative, though rooted in Romanticism, asks urgent questions: What defines humanity? Can innovation coexist with responsibility? In an age of AI and genetic engineering, Frankenstein remains a stark reminder: creation demands accountability—its absence breeds ruin. In conclusion,a timeless cautionary tale, Frankenstein warns that ambition without empathy destroys both creator and creation. Its power lies in exposing the cost of prejudice and the ethical weight of shaping life, making it indispensable for every generation.