有闲阶级论:关于制度的经济研究(英文版)
    The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions

  • 作   者:

    托斯丹·邦德·凡勃伦

  • 出版社:

    外语教学与研究出版社

  • 语   言:

    英文

  • ¥5.90

  • 试    读 购    买 加入购物车
  • 导读
  • 20世纪初洛阳纸贵的经济著作,制度与经济关系的探讨。

    The Theory of the Leisure Class was based on a trio of articles published in the American Journal of Sociology in 1898, and contained most of the major themes Veblen would develop in his later works. Veblen’s theories were based on and relevant to contemporary issues in the U.S., but were conceived at the starting point of American social sciences. He was influenced by writers such as Charles Darwin, Adam Smith and Herbert Spencer. His most important inspiration, however, seems to have been Karl Marx, in that Veblen argues for a materialist perspective on the formation of society, saying that the latter is shaped by its citizens' ways of procuring a livelihood. Unlike Marx, on the other hand, Veblen did not see labor, but technology and industrial arts, as the creative forces in society. His interest in production as not just a means of serving society's needs, but also a way of making a profit for the owner class, was shared by classical theorists of his day.

    Veblen thought that economists of his era were too static and hedonistic in their theories, despite being an economist himself. He argued that instead of focusing solely on theoretical deductions, economists should take larger social and cultural issues into account. Whereas neoclassical economics define human beings as rational, utility-seeking agents who try to maximize their pleasure, Veblen recast people as irrational, economic creatures who pursue social status with little regard to their own happiness. He saw the rise of conspicuous consumption in the 19th century not as progress, but as influenced by the British aristocracy, and therefore un-American. The Theory of the Leisure Class was not so much a timeless theory as a result of Veblen's perception of a rapidly developing society. His opinion of the U.S. was also colored by his background as a child of Norwegian immigrants who had lived in a Norwegian community within America. Veblen’s perception of the U.S. was therefore underlined by its sharp contrasts to the immigrant community where he grew up.

  • 内容简介
  • 《有闲阶级论:关于制度的经济研究》是凡勃伦于1899年出版的首部著作,一经问世立即引起轰动,成为当时知识分子人手一册的风行之作。作者通过研究制度的起源,观察社会上的经济现象,尤其是上层阶级的有闲特权与消费特征,来探讨制度与经济现象之间微妙的关系。书中对社会现象、消费行为、人类心理的剖析鞭辟入里,说明了习惯、文化和制度如何塑造人类行为,以及人类行为的变化怎样影响经济。同时又从有闲阶级的角度出发,阐释了其产生、发展的过程以及其中所折射出的经济意义。

    The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (1899), by Thorstein Veblen, is an economic treatise and detailed social critique of conspicuous consumption, as a function of social-class consumerism. It proposes that the social strata and the division of labor of the feudal period continued into the modern era. The lords of the manor employed themselves in the economically useless practices of conspicuous consumption and conspicuous leisure, while the middle and lower classes were employed in the industrial occupations that support the whole of society. Economically wasteful activities are those activities that do not contribute to the economy or to the material productivity required for the fruitful functioning of society. Veblen's analyses of business cycles and prices, and of the emergent technocratic division of labor by speciality (scientists, engineers, technologists) at the end of the 19th century proved to be accurate predictions of the nature of an industrial society.

  • 作者简介
  • 托斯丹•邦德•凡勃伦(Thorstein B. Veblen,1857-1929)伟大的美国经济学巨匠、制度经济学鼻祖。凡勃仑是作为一个辛辣的社会批评家而为一般公众所知的,他这一风格的代表作是《有闲阶级论》一书。但从职业上说,他是个经济学家,是政治经济学杂志的第一主编,并在经济学的方法论问题上有广泛著述。制度经济学——几十年来的一个重要学派,是凡勃仑和约翰•R•康芒斯(John R. Commons)创立的,韦斯利•克莱尔(Wesley Clair)、约翰•莫里斯•克拉克(John Maurice Clark)等后来的凡勃仑追随者们形成了这一学派的特点。

    Thorstein Bunde Veblen (born Torsten Bunde Veblen; July 30, 1857 – August 3, 1929) was an American economist and sociologist, and leader of the institutional economics movement. Veblen is credited for the main technical principle used by institutional economists, known as the Veblenian dichotomy. It is a distinction between what Veblen called "institutions" and "technology".Besides his technical work, Veblen was a popular and witty critic of capitalism, as illustrated by his best-known book The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899).

  • 目录
    • Chapter One Introductory
    • Chapter Two Pecuniary Emulation
    • Chapter Three Conspicuous Leisure
    • Chapter Four Conspicuous Consumption
    • Chapter Five The Pecuniary Standard of Living
    • Chapter Six Pecuniary Canons of Taste
    • Chapter Seven Dress as an Expression of the Pecuniary Culture
    • Chapter Eight Industrial Exemption and Conservatism
    • Chapter Nine The Conservation of Archaic Traits
    • Chapter Ten Modern Survivals of Prowess
    • Chapter Eleven The Belief in Luck
    • Chapter Twelve Devout Observances
    • Chapter Thirteen Survivals of the Non-Invidious Interests
    • Chapter Fourteen The Higher Learning as an Expression of the Pecuniary Culture
    展开