书评

学习通考试 First, use letters and diaries in the case narrative, that is, excerpts from Watson's reports and diaries to Sherlock Holmes. This method classifys the time into three stages: when the event progresses; when Watson writes letters; and Watson when he reviews. For the same thing, the feeling at that time, the feeling when writing a diary, and the feeling of being reviewed many years later must be completely different. But Conan Doyle himself didn't realise the problem. Because he did not use the time difference and information difference of these three time nodes to create the illusion of narrative, there was no obvious difference between the chapters "When Watson wrote letters" and the chapters of "when Events were in progress", and they were still just a simple finite perspective statement. The second is the hidden existence of the detective, that Holmes did not tell Watson that he was hiding in a stone hut. This was actually done with an unreliable narrative. Conan Doyle made us and Watson think that Holmes was not present. But he also did not dig into the narrative potential in this regard. Holmes deceived Watson, but he didn't really deceive Watson - because he was still "doing nothing" during this period. He just got information Watson didn't know as usual, but it doesn't matter how he got it. Because his hidden behaviour did not have any impact on Watson's experience. In a word, the novel "The Dog" is a simple work of Conan Doyle's narrative exploration of detective novels.