The love that dances between flowers
What you often tell is nothing but a flower between your eyebrows. What is there under the flower?
People often speak highly of Jane. Love, her independence, her fortitude, her feminist consciousness. Hidden in her delicate little body was a man's heart. Bronte's description of her, has the character that the ordinary woman does not have, does not submit under the power, has her own advice, and her employer's equal, loudly shouted that you think, without beauty, without money, I do not have the same soul as you, no independent personality of the woman. She spoke for everybody, she spoke for The Times and so she became a mythical existence in Bronte's words. There is not a shadow of doubt, she is the capital she.
But in life, people are only individual, is private, there are joy, sadness, joy even deep in the hot heart, they still churn, still shiver. Yes, the new version of Jane Eyre has Mr. Darcy's Rochester and Jane's expressionless facial paralysis. Fans of the book jumped out and cried out that the film was completely missing the point of the novel, that it did not perfectly represent Jane, let alone the wild beast of Rochester, that it was so frustrating, and that the director had reportedly not read the book, only the script. But if the scriptwriter's interpretation of the novel, if the scriptwriter's deconstruction of the novel itself, the charm of the film itself, I think, is enough to move me.
From the film itself, from the Angle of narrative movie, my heart, I have been able to see the director in the stories told in the form of flashbacks plot is inherently can avoid anything growth theme, friends have bean evaluation of Jane eyre is a pure love story, but from the novel itself, I always thought that is theme, growth in the process of growing, love of nature is inevitable, as our heroine by girls become women process smoothly. However, the flashbacks of the film successfully highlight the theme of love, which does make the narrative of the film more compact, even without the novel can also have a good story.
At the beginning of the film, black and gray colors cover the picture until Jane meets her best friend Helen. Bright colors begin to appear in the film. The distinctive colors are a little strong, but when used to compare the beautiful and bright colors when Jane and Rochester are together in the film, I think it is really understandable. Fans at the end, many original points out that the less the humorous words, the other end slightly abruptly, I just think this omission is more reasonable, in fact, Jane wants to go to rochester, the director has told us that Jane was looking for his own echo of the soul, so when lovers meet again, no more words, the dignified atmosphere feeling is more than those melodramatic words more tension. Fiction, after all, is the art of language, and if the film can be shown with good pictures, words will be redundant.
Yes, it is the feeling in the film that makes many viewers feel that the heroine's face is paralyzed, with no expression and no voice. Just like Jane after learning the truth, she was expressionless, calm and grave at first. It was only when he met Rochester that he fell apart. I think this is the most natural interpretation. In many details, the heroine is indeed expressionless but this silent performance is better than the over-dramatic things. It feels right. This version of Rochester is a little too handsome, but you can't ask the man on the big screen to be without texture, which would also be without the beauty of the picture. Amazing, oil painting feeling, is indeed some. Therefore, regardless of the original work, the film as a representative of pure beauty of emotion is not too much.
Classical pictures, classical music, perfect love.
京公网安备 11010802032529号