主题介绍

爱洋葱班班

【研讨会】

推荐书籍：柏拉图《理想国》、柏拉图《会饮篇》、墨子《墨子》、谷崎润一郎《阴翳礼赞》

作为审美和记忆的载体，艺术自文明诞生以来便成为社会无法分割的一部分。事实上，从古至今东西方的哲人们从未停止过关于艺术与社会的争论：艺术究竟应当在社会中承担怎样的责任？或者说，艺术在社会中的作用是否是正面的？从古希腊的柏拉图，到春秋战国时代的墨子，再到近代日本的谷崎润一郎，我们将跨越时空，一同探讨艺术的角色。

【工作坊：艺术作品赏析】

在如今这个现代艺术充斥着各个角落的时代，艺术的宗旨已经不再是单纯的“画得像”。但我们作为现代的人却并不能完全接纳并且去体验以及欣赏那些各式各样的现代艺术。今年暑假，我会带领大家一起追寻现代艺术的根源，并且让大家熟悉这个领域。我们会一起阅读二十世纪以及二十一世纪艺术批评家的文章，一起欣赏那些对于某个特定时代重要的艺术作品以及艺术家，并且亲自踏入当代艺术的领域，尝试自己去理解那些看上去匪夷所思的艺术品。

2018-07-10

分享

喜欢(0) 快速回复

回复

• 

  LZH__
  In the chapter six,Socrates take “captain “for example to express it’s hard to be worldly wise and make himself safe for philosophers.As the saying goes “Truth is in the hands of few.”With we growing up , we can get a lot of knowledge but we will lose our ability of thinking. I think in the modern society most of us become more and more narrow. We just accept one side of the world and forget the other sides. So I think it’s due to the great power of the public’s thoughts and just few people can be regarded as the philosophers.

  2018-08-06 刪除 喜欢(0)

• 

  T.O.N.Y
  I'm sorry if I wrote too much :(

  2018-08-06 刪除 喜欢(0)

• 

  T.O.N.Y

  In book VII, Socrates(Plato) depicted the famous allegory of the cave and stated that everyone has the potential to lead a good life and to discover truth while the problem is that they are not educated in a correct way.

  The following is a rather irrelevant comment:

  
  

  
  

  I doubt the point that what the man discovers in the outside world should be considered to be true and I disagree with the wording “truer” (515d). I think the crisis is not about what is “truer”. Instead, it is about the actual being of truth. What if the man then discovers he’s only a vision created by the brain in the vet? The problem will not be finding a truer world but only to except the annihilation of truth since we may not attribute nothingness to the so called truth. To avoid the possibility of this tragedy, I suppose we should even discard the notion of truth.

  
  

  2018-08-06 刪除 喜欢(1)

• 

  T.O.N.Y

  This is a brief summary of my thought on the highlight paragraphs.

  In book VI, Socrates(Plato) first discussed the difference between good itself and the methodologies of goodness i.e. the “knowledge and truth’’ (508e) by constructing the metaphor of the eyesight and the sunlight, he then deviates from the current discussion to the depiction of the segmented soul, which is unequally divided into four parts: The first two parts incorporates the notions of “image” and “likeness” (510a). Image, if I got it right?, represents the very basic forms (shapes) which is universal e.g. the shape of the sun. Likeness then represents the icons that are not eternal (this is how I tried to interpret his example of animals and growing things), but may still denote to the same being. The other two parts then represents the process ending with the hypothesis and the one beginning with the hypothesis (510c). If I am on the right track, the difference between these two is pretty much similar (if not the same?) with that between the method of induction and the method of deduction. Still, I’m very interested in the remarks of Glaucon on art: art is something that begins with a hypothesis (511c).

  
  

  2018-08-06 刪除 喜欢(1)

• 

  拧发条鸟

  hi

  
  

  2018-08-06 刪除 喜欢(0)