民主的力量 卢秀婷E13
爱国小青年
Society is composed of humans, and let a social group have a work that is not chaotic. It depends on the contract as discussed in the author's article. It seems to me that if we combine the way the Chinese look at the world, the so-called contract that the author discusses, in our Chinese eyes, is the so-called moral restraint. Just as the author argues that the social contract is determined by the public will, these public will are of course good and bad. For example, the long-standing thoughts of loyalty and filial piety and male superiority in China are two very appropriate examples of good and bad.
After reading this book, I am actually impressed with the distinction between law and decree. The author satirizes the absurd political behavior of certain politicians. Part of the book I think is extremely relevant to some of the phenomena in China today. For example, people's resolutions are not completely correct. Their orientation is personal interests. Sometimes people will accept something bad. This reminds me of the noisy "help and not help" problem of the previous two years. With the increase of Chinese netizens, the power of online public opinion can not be underestimated. At this time, it will be difficult to avoid the formation of some bad network winds. Sometimes it may also lead to the education of the next generation of young people. Now popular small fresh meat, excessive star-chasing, net red is affecting the next generation. I once read a report that it is said that today's children's professional outlook is no longer as scientists, astronauts, etc., but as online stars.
In this book, I have to mention another one, that is, the author of the "government." In the article, the author clearly explained "legislative rights" and "administrative power." I very much agree with the author that the government is only the agent of the state and the sovereign body. This statement is very moving. From this statement, the removal of the cold image of the government has not excessively deepened the government. In fact, in today's world, the role of government in each country is too large, and even in some countries, the regional government is higher than the people. I personally believe that the government is very important but we must understand the government correctly. We must not only make full use of government functions to guide a country's good and fast development, but also put the government in the right position. We must not exaggerate the government. So I think the author makes a good explanation of the government.
In the fourth volume, the author put forward an argument that "the public will is indestructible." Of course, in my own understanding, this public will refers to the common interests of the people and is a good wind direction. As the author says, a liar may be able to fool one or two people, but if it is a group of people, it will be difficult. This is a good example of public will. At the same time, the author also suggested that the public will is stable, but it is very likely to be overwhelmed by other winds. From the text I can also find that other winds can be well understood, that is, the opposite of the public-private interests. The author also mentioned voting and used the example of the Roman Empire to discuss voting in two ways. One is a fair vote and the other is a flattering vote, which discusses the relationship between the strength of the public will and the weakness of the country. In the end, it was concluded that the importance of public will to a country. In this case, the author also said that the central point of this article is that the social contract shows that the social contract is actually a law. But I look at it from a Chinese perspective and I think I'm going to add the ethics I mentioned earlier.
京公网安备 11010802032529号