西方思想史上最早谈及艺术灵感的文献,唯一从艺术角度谈诗的对话。
Plato’s argument is supposed to be an early example of a so-called genetic fallacy since his conclusion arises from his famous lodestone (magnet) analogy. Ion, the rhapsode “dangles like a lodestone at the end of a chain of lodestones. The muse inspires the poet (Homer in Ion’s case) and the poet inspires the rhapsode.” Plato’s dialogues are themselves “examples of artistry that continue to be stageworthy;” it is a paradox that “Plato the supreme enemy of art is also the supreme artist.”
《伊安篇》属于柏拉图早期的作品,是柏拉图的对话中,唯一从艺术角度谈诗的对话,也是西方思想史上最早谈及艺术灵感的文献。
In Plato's Ion Socrates discusses with Ion, a professional rhapsode who also lectures on Homer, the question of whether the rhapsode, a performer of poetry, gives his performance on account of his skill and knowledge or by virtue of divine possession. It is one of the shorter of Plato's dialogues.
- ION
- 书评 写书评
- 笔记
-
书评加载中...
笔记加载中...