不知多少人有过大卫•席尔兹在《现实的饥饿》中所描述的那种经历:阅读某部长篇小说,它本质上有着非常传统的结构和现实主义风格,把书中各个人物若干年的生活交织在一起,但读下来只感觉它已经变得跟这个时代毫不相干。席尔兹说这番话的用意并非批判作者——他提到的作者是乔纳森•弗兰岑——追求长篇现实主义小说的传统。相反,他认为这是由于他自身发生了改变,是完全脱胎换骨了的现代生活的本质所造成的。
I wonder how many people share the experience described by David Shields in Reality Hunger, of tackling some large novel, a work essentially conventional in its structure and brand of realism, that weaves together the lives of its characters over a number of years, and simply feeling that the whole exercise has become largely irrelevant. Shields doesn’t present his remarks as a criticism of writers—the name he mentions is Jonathan Franzen—pursuing the tradition of the long realistic novel. Rather, he suggests it is a change in himself, something he believes has been brought about by the utterly changed nature of contemporary life.
在虚拟世界变得如此强大的现代社会,电子媒体的多样化让我们接收到的信息日益丰富。在这种生活方式下,传统的小说类型已经很难再吸引我们的注意力。传统小说在多数情况下与现代生活的本质之间存在差距,它能给人们留下明确的、连续的、有意义的印象,而这些特质也可能正是它最靠谱、最具吸引力的方面。
- 小说之困
- Trapped Inside the Novel
- 书评 写书评
- 笔记
-
书评加载中...
笔记加载中...